Empathy List Archives

KA

Kelly, Andrew

Wed, Jun 20, 2018 4:49 PM

I think linearization result item is not available on a model with cyclic symmetry. Pls check the manual; this issue sounds familiar to me. You may have to switch to symmetry and re-run to be able to use linearization.

-- Andrew

Andrew Kelly, P.E.
Engineering Manager, Load
Honeywell | Sensing & Productivity Solutions
2080 Arlingate Lane
Columbus, OH 43228
Office: 614.850.7818
Toll Free: 800.848.6564
Fax: 614.850.1111

andrew.kelly@honeywell.com mailto:andrew.kelly@honeywell.com
measurementsensors.honeywell.com
Twitter: @HoneywellNow

I think linearization result item is not available on a model with cyclic symmetry. Pls check the manual; this issue sounds familiar to me. You may have to switch to symmetry and re-run to be able to use linearization. -- Andrew Andrew Kelly, P.E. Engineering Manager, Load Honeywell | Sensing & Productivity Solutions 2080 Arlingate Lane Columbus, OH 43228 Office: 614.850.7818 Toll Free: 800.848.6564 Fax: 614.850.1111 andrew.kelly@honeywell.com<mailto:andrew.kelly@honeywell.com> measurementsensors.honeywell.com Twitter: @HoneywellNow

RH

Ross Hartwig

Thu, Jun 21, 2018 10:12 AM

Hi Andrew,

Thanks for your response. Unfortunately the manual isn't clear, at least not as I could find.

It's a particularly frustrating bug, as a long time classic/APDL user, I'm used to being able to extract linearised stresses from models with cyclic symmetry and as a recent convert to Workbench, with all its bells and whistles, I was expecting at least this minimal functionality, so quite disappointed as you can imagine that it was missing.

However, I have found a solution, which I'm sharing for any others who may have this issue in the future. And it doesn't require the use of standard symmetry, which is often not appropriate for asymmetrical-but-cyclic geometry.

First I refer you to knowledge base item 2022347 which clearly indicates that linearisation under cyclic symmetry is not possible. The workaround requires the use of an APDL command snippet under the solution tree as demonstrated in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mv4bTvkaHmU by the guys at SimuTech. The advantage of this method is the cyclic nature of your model is maintained and cut planes do not need to be radial as long as geometry and nodes perfectly match. The results are excellent compared with true cyclic symmetry, tested under ANSYS 19.1.

I hope this helps others as it has helped me! And I hope this is something ANSYS will include in future releases as standard.

Regards,
Ross Hartwig

Finglow Consultants Ltd
Beane Bridge House
34 Chambers Street
Hertford
Hertfordshire
SG14 1PL

Tel: 01992 585456
Fax: 01992 585466
e-mail: rgbh@finglowconsultants.co.uk
Website: www.finglowconsultants.co.uk

Sent from Finglow Consultants Limited
Registered in England and Wales No. 2020210
Registered Office: Beane Bridge House, 34 Chambers Street, Hertford, Hertfordshire, SG14 1PL, England.

The information contained in this email and any attachments may be confidential and is provided solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution, or use of this e-mail, its attachments or any information contained therein is unauthorised and prohibited. If you have received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachments. No responsibility is accepted for any virus or defect that might arise from opening this e-mail or attachments, whether or not it has been checked by anti-virus software.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kelly, Andrew [mailto:Andrew.Kelly@Honeywell.com]
Sent: 20 June 2018 17:49
To: xansys-temp@xansystest.info
Subject: Re: [Xansys] Scoping method error on linearisation tool in workbench

I think linearization result item is not available on a model with cyclic symmetry. Pls check the manual; this issue sounds familiar to me. You may have to switch to symmetry and re-run to be able to use linearization.

-- Andrew

Andrew Kelly, P.E.
Engineering Manager, Load
Honeywell | Sensing & Productivity Solutions
2080 Arlingate Lane
Columbus, OH 43228
Office: 614.850.7818
Toll Free: 800.848.6564
Fax: 614.850.1111

andrew.kelly@honeywell.com mailto:andrew.kelly@honeywell.com
measurementsensors.honeywell.com
Twitter: @HoneywellNow

Xansys-temp mailing list
Xansys-temp@xansystest.info
http://xansystest.info/mailman/listinfo/xansys-temp_xansystest.info
If you are receiving too many emails from XANSYS please consider changing account settings to Digest mode which will send a single email per day.

Please send administrative requests such as deletion from XANSYS to xansys-mod@tynecomp.co.uk and not to the list

Hi Andrew, Thanks for your response. Unfortunately the manual isn't clear, at least not as I could find. It's a particularly frustrating bug, as a long time classic/APDL user, I'm used to being able to extract linearised stresses from models with cyclic symmetry and as a recent convert to Workbench, with all its bells and whistles, I was expecting at least this minimal functionality, so quite disappointed as you can imagine that it was missing. However, I have found a solution, which I'm sharing for any others who may have this issue in the future. And it doesn't require the use of standard symmetry, which is often not appropriate for asymmetrical-but-cyclic geometry. First I refer you to knowledge base item 2022347 which clearly indicates that linearisation under cyclic symmetry is not possible. The workaround requires the use of an APDL command snippet under the solution tree as demonstrated in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mv4bTvkaHmU by the guys at SimuTech. The advantage of this method is the cyclic nature of your model is maintained and cut planes do not need to be radial as long as geometry and nodes perfectly match. The results are excellent compared with true cyclic symmetry, tested under ANSYS 19.1. I hope this helps others as it has helped me! And I hope this is something ANSYS will include in future releases as standard. Regards, Ross Hartwig Finglow Consultants Ltd Beane Bridge House 34 Chambers Street Hertford Hertfordshire SG14 1PL Tel: 01992 585456 Fax: 01992 585466 e-mail: rgbh@finglowconsultants.co.uk Website: www.finglowconsultants.co.uk Sent from Finglow Consultants Limited Registered in England and Wales No. 2020210 Registered Office: Beane Bridge House, 34 Chambers Street, Hertford, Hertfordshire, SG14 1PL, England. The information contained in this email and any attachments may be confidential and is provided solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution, or use of this e-mail, its attachments or any information contained therein is unauthorised and prohibited. If you have received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachments. No responsibility is accepted for any virus or defect that might arise from opening this e-mail or attachments, whether or not it has been checked by anti-virus software. -----Original Message----- From: Kelly, Andrew [mailto:Andrew.Kelly@Honeywell.com] Sent: 20 June 2018 17:49 To: xansys-temp@xansystest.info Subject: Re: [Xansys] Scoping method error on linearisation tool in workbench I think linearization result item is not available on a model with cyclic symmetry. Pls check the manual; this issue sounds familiar to me. You may have to switch to symmetry and re-run to be able to use linearization. -- Andrew Andrew Kelly, P.E. Engineering Manager, Load Honeywell | Sensing & Productivity Solutions 2080 Arlingate Lane Columbus, OH 43228 Office: 614.850.7818 Toll Free: 800.848.6564 Fax: 614.850.1111 andrew.kelly@honeywell.com<mailto:andrew.kelly@honeywell.com> measurementsensors.honeywell.com Twitter: @HoneywellNow _______________________________________________ Xansys-temp mailing list Xansys-temp@xansystest.info http://xansystest.info/mailman/listinfo/xansys-temp_xansystest.info If you are receiving too many emails from XANSYS please consider changing account settings to Digest mode which will send a single email per day. Please send administrative requests such as deletion from XANSYS to xansys-mod@tynecomp.co.uk and not to the list

MN

Marshall, Nathaniel (GE Power)

Thu, Jun 21, 2018 1:03 PM

I just have to say, that SimuTech video is remarkably clear and well done. I am impressed when I see that kind of methodical, efficient clarity of explanation. I remember stumbling on another video in the past with the same narrator, and thought the same thing at that time.

Nat

Nat Marshall
Senior Engineer, Rotor Technology
Generator Technology
GE Power
1 River Road, Bldg 273-3002F
Schenectady, NY 12345

-----Original Message-----
From: Ross Hartwig [mailto:rgbh@finglowconsultants.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 6:13 AM
To: XANSYS Mailing List Temporary Home xansys-temp@xansystest.info
Subject: EXT: Re: [Xansys] Scoping method error on linearisation tool in workbench

Hi Andrew,

Thanks for your response. Unfortunately the manual isn't clear, at least not as I could find.

It's a particularly frustrating bug, as a long time classic/APDL user, I'm used to being able to extract linearised stresses from models with cyclic symmetry and as a recent convert to Workbench, with all its bells and whistles, I was expecting at least this minimal functionality, so quite disappointed as you can imagine that it was missing.

However, I have found a solution, which I'm sharing for any others who may have this issue in the future. And it doesn't require the use of standard symmetry, which is often not appropriate for asymmetrical-but-cyclic geometry.

First I refer you to knowledge base item 2022347 which clearly indicates that linearisation under cyclic symmetry is not possible. The workaround requires the use of an APDL command snippet under the solution tree as demonstrated in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mv4bTvkaHmU by the guys at SimuTech. The advantage of this method is the cyclic nature of your model is maintained and cut planes do not need to be radial as long as geometry and nodes perfectly match. The results are excellent compared with true cyclic symmetry, tested under ANSYS 19.1.

I hope this helps others as it has helped me! And I hope this is something ANSYS will include in future releases as standard.

Regards,
Ross Hartwig

Finglow Consultants Ltd
Beane Bridge House
34 Chambers Street
Hertford
Hertfordshire
SG14 1PL

Tel: 01992 585456
Fax: 01992 585466
e-mail: rgbh@finglowconsultants.co.uk
Website: www.finglowconsultants.co.uk

Sent from Finglow Consultants Limited
Registered in England and Wales No. 2020210 Registered Office: Beane Bridge House, 34 Chambers Street, Hertford, Hertfordshire, SG14 1PL, England.

The information contained in this email and any attachments may be confidential and is provided solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution, or use of this e-mail, its attachments or any information contained therein is unauthorised and prohibited. If you have received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachments. No responsibility is accepted for any virus or defect that might arise from opening this e-mail or attachments, whether or not it has been checked by anti-virus software.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kelly, Andrew [mailto:Andrew.Kelly@Honeywell.com]
Sent: 20 June 2018 17:49
To: xansys-temp@xansystest.info
Subject: Re: [Xansys] Scoping method error on linearisation tool in workbench

I think linearization result item is not available on a model with cyclic symmetry. Pls check the manual; this issue sounds familiar to me. You may have to switch to symmetry and re-run to be able to use linearization.

-- Andrew

Andrew Kelly, P.E.
Engineering Manager, Load
Honeywell | Sensing & Productivity Solutions
2080 Arlingate Lane
Columbus, OH 43228
Office: 614.850.7818
Toll Free: 800.848.6564
Fax: 614.850.1111

andrew.kelly@honeywell.com mailto:andrew.kelly@honeywell.com
measurementsensors.honeywell.com
Twitter: @HoneywellNow

Xansys-temp mailing list
Xansys-temp@xansystest.info
http://xansystest.info/mailman/listinfo/xansys-temp_xansystest.info
If you are receiving too many emails from XANSYS please consider changing account settings to Digest mode which will send a single email per day.

Please send administrative requests such as deletion from XANSYS to xansys-mod@tynecomp.co.uk and not to the list

Xansys-temp mailing list
Xansys-temp@xansystest.info
http://xansystest.info/mailman/listinfo/xansys-temp_xansystest.info
If you are receiving too many emails from XANSYS please consider changing account settings to Digest mode which will send a single email per day.

Please send administrative requests such as deletion from XANSYS to xansys-mod@tynecomp.co.uk and not to the list

I just have to say, that SimuTech video is remarkably clear and well done. I am impressed when I see that kind of methodical, efficient clarity of explanation. I remember stumbling on another video in the past with the same narrator, and thought the same thing at that time. Nat Nat Marshall Senior Engineer, Rotor Technology Generator Technology GE Power 1 River Road, Bldg 273-3002F Schenectady, NY 12345 -----Original Message----- From: Ross Hartwig [mailto:rgbh@finglowconsultants.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 6:13 AM To: XANSYS Mailing List Temporary Home <xansys-temp@xansystest.info> Subject: EXT: Re: [Xansys] Scoping method error on linearisation tool in workbench Hi Andrew, Thanks for your response. Unfortunately the manual isn't clear, at least not as I could find. It's a particularly frustrating bug, as a long time classic/APDL user, I'm used to being able to extract linearised stresses from models with cyclic symmetry and as a recent convert to Workbench, with all its bells and whistles, I was expecting at least this minimal functionality, so quite disappointed as you can imagine that it was missing. However, I have found a solution, which I'm sharing for any others who may have this issue in the future. And it doesn't require the use of standard symmetry, which is often not appropriate for asymmetrical-but-cyclic geometry. First I refer you to knowledge base item 2022347 which clearly indicates that linearisation under cyclic symmetry is not possible. The workaround requires the use of an APDL command snippet under the solution tree as demonstrated in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mv4bTvkaHmU by the guys at SimuTech. The advantage of this method is the cyclic nature of your model is maintained and cut planes do not need to be radial as long as geometry and nodes perfectly match. The results are excellent compared with true cyclic symmetry, tested under ANSYS 19.1. I hope this helps others as it has helped me! And I hope this is something ANSYS will include in future releases as standard. Regards, Ross Hartwig Finglow Consultants Ltd Beane Bridge House 34 Chambers Street Hertford Hertfordshire SG14 1PL Tel: 01992 585456 Fax: 01992 585466 e-mail: rgbh@finglowconsultants.co.uk Website: www.finglowconsultants.co.uk Sent from Finglow Consultants Limited Registered in England and Wales No. 2020210 Registered Office: Beane Bridge House, 34 Chambers Street, Hertford, Hertfordshire, SG14 1PL, England. The information contained in this email and any attachments may be confidential and is provided solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution, or use of this e-mail, its attachments or any information contained therein is unauthorised and prohibited. If you have received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachments. No responsibility is accepted for any virus or defect that might arise from opening this e-mail or attachments, whether or not it has been checked by anti-virus software. -----Original Message----- From: Kelly, Andrew [mailto:Andrew.Kelly@Honeywell.com] Sent: 20 June 2018 17:49 To: xansys-temp@xansystest.info Subject: Re: [Xansys] Scoping method error on linearisation tool in workbench I think linearization result item is not available on a model with cyclic symmetry. Pls check the manual; this issue sounds familiar to me. You may have to switch to symmetry and re-run to be able to use linearization. -- Andrew Andrew Kelly, P.E. Engineering Manager, Load Honeywell | Sensing & Productivity Solutions 2080 Arlingate Lane Columbus, OH 43228 Office: 614.850.7818 Toll Free: 800.848.6564 Fax: 614.850.1111 andrew.kelly@honeywell.com<mailto:andrew.kelly@honeywell.com> measurementsensors.honeywell.com Twitter: @HoneywellNow _______________________________________________ Xansys-temp mailing list Xansys-temp@xansystest.info http://xansystest.info/mailman/listinfo/xansys-temp_xansystest.info If you are receiving too many emails from XANSYS please consider changing account settings to Digest mode which will send a single email per day. Please send administrative requests such as deletion from XANSYS to xansys-mod@tynecomp.co.uk and not to the list _______________________________________________ Xansys-temp mailing list Xansys-temp@xansystest.info http://xansystest.info/mailman/listinfo/xansys-temp_xansystest.info If you are receiving too many emails from XANSYS please consider changing account settings to Digest mode which will send a single email per day. Please send administrative requests such as deletion from XANSYS to xansys-mod@tynecomp.co.uk and not to the list

TJ

Tiago José Medeiros de Araujo Lira

Thu, Jun 21, 2018 3:02 PM

They have really good material. Their written tutorials are as good as this video.

They have (or had, it's been a while) a blog where they would showcase some ansys functionalities, everything well written and illustrated. I recommend everyone to check it out.

(Simutech, I'm expecting my ad check for the end of this month =P)

Atenciosamente,

Best regards,

Tiago José Medeiros de Araújo Lira
Engenheiro Mecânico
Mechanical Engineer
[cid:0x6d1322e.0xe11b22a1.0x0a598ce47aef79823889f5fd]
Fone (Phone): +55 81 3311-7458tel:+55%2081%203311-7458
www.estaleiroatlanticosul.com.br http://www.estaleiroatlanticosul.com.br/
Ilha de Tatuoca, s/n - Complexo Portuário de Suape
Ipojuca-PE, Brasil, CEP (Zip Code) 55594-900tel:55594-900
EAS Confidencial: 0800 721 5970tel:0800%20721%205970
www.easconfidencial.com.br http://www.easconfidencial.com.br/

Email enviado pelo celular

A 21 de junho de 2018 10:04:15, "Marshall, Nathaniel (GE Power)" nathaniel.marshall@ge.com escreveu:

I just have to say, that SimuTech video is remarkably clear and well done. I am impressed when I see that kind of methodical, efficient clarity of explanation. I remember stumbling on another video in the past with the same narrator, and thought the same thing at that time.

Nat

Nat Marshall
Senior Engineer, Rotor Technology
Generator Technology
GE Power
1 River Road, Bldg 273-3002F
Schenectady, NY 12345

-----Original Message-----
From: Ross Hartwig [mailto:rgbh@finglowconsultants.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 6:13 AM
To: XANSYS Mailing List Temporary Home xansys-temp@xansystest.info
Subject: EXT: Re: [Xansys] Scoping method error on linearisation tool in workbench

Hi Andrew,

Thanks for your response. Unfortunately the manual isn't clear, at least not as I could find.

It's a particularly frustrating bug, as a long time classic/APDL user, I'm used to being able to extract linearised stresses from models with cyclic symmetry and as a recent convert to Workbench, with all its bells and whistles, I was expecting at least this minimal functionality, so quite disappointed as you can imagine that it was missing.

However, I have found a solution, which I'm sharing for any others who may have this issue in the future. And it doesn't require the use of standard symmetry, which is often not appropriate for asymmetrical-but-cyclic geometry.

First I refer you to knowledge base item 2022347 which clearly indicates that linearisation under cyclic symmetry is not possible. The workaround requires the use of an APDL command snippet under the solution tree as demonstrated in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mv4bTvkaHmU by the guys at SimuTech. The advantage of this method is the cyclic nature of your model is maintained and cut planes do not need to be radial as long as geometry and nodes perfectly match. The results are excellent compared with true cyclic symmetry, tested under ANSYS 19.1.

I hope this helps others as it has helped me! And I hope this is something ANSYS will include in future releases as standard.

Regards,
Ross Hartwig

Finglow Consultants Ltd
Beane Bridge House
34 Chambers Street
Hertford
Hertfordshire
SG14 1PL

Tel: 01992 585456
Fax: 01992 585466
e-mail: rgbh@finglowconsultants.co.uk
Website: www.finglowconsultants.co.uk

Sent from Finglow Consultants Limited
Registered in England and Wales No. 2020210 Registered Office: Beane Bridge House, 34 Chambers Street, Hertford, Hertfordshire, SG14 1PL, England.

The information contained in this email and any attachments may be confidential and is provided solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution, or use of this e-mail, its attachments or any information contained therein is unauthorised and prohibited. If you have received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachments. No responsibility is accepted for any virus or defect that might arise from opening this e-mail or attachments, whether or not it has been checked by anti-virus software.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kelly, Andrew [mailto:Andrew.Kelly@Honeywell.com]
Sent: 20 June 2018 17:49
To: xansys-temp@xansystest.info
Subject: Re: [Xansys] Scoping method error on linearisation tool in workbench

I think linearization result item is not available on a model with cyclic symmetry. Pls check the manual; this issue sounds familiar to me. You may have to switch to symmetry and re-run to be able to use linearization.

-- Andrew

Andrew Kelly, P.E.
Engineering Manager, Load
Honeywell | Sensing & Productivity Solutions
2080 Arlingate Lane
Columbus, OH 43228
Office: 614.850.7818
Toll Free: 800.848.6564
Fax: 614.850.1111

andrew.kelly@honeywell.com mailto:andrew.kelly@honeywell.com
measurementsensors.honeywell.com
Twitter: @HoneywellNow

Xansys-temp mailing list
Xansys-temp@xansystest.info
http://xansystest.info/mailman/listinfo/xansys-temp_xansystest.info
If you are receiving too many emails from XANSYS please consider changing account settings to Digest mode which will send a single email per day.

Please send administrative requests such as deletion from XANSYS to xansys-mod@tynecomp.co.uk and not to the list

Xansys-temp mailing list
Xansys-temp@xansystest.info
http://xansystest.info/mailman/listinfo/xansys-temp_xansystest.info
If you are receiving too many emails from XANSYS please consider changing account settings to Digest mode which will send a single email per day.

Please send administrative requests such as deletion from XANSYS to xansys-mod@tynecomp.co.uk and not to the list

Xansys-temp mailing list
Xansys-temp@xansystest.info
http://xansystest.info/mailman/listinfo/xansys-temp_xansystest.info
If you are receiving too many emails from XANSYS please consider changing account settings to Digest mode which will send a single email per day.

Please send administrative requests such as deletion from XANSYS to xansys-mod@tynecomp.co.uk and not to the list

They have really good material. Their written tutorials are as good as this video. They have (or had, it's been a while) a blog where they would showcase some ansys functionalities, everything well written and illustrated. I recommend everyone to check it out. (Simutech, I'm expecting my ad check for the end of this month =P) Atenciosamente, Best regards, Tiago José Medeiros de Araújo Lira Engenheiro Mecânico Mechanical Engineer [cid:0x6d1322e.0xe11b22a1.0x0a598ce47aef79823889f5fd] Fone (Phone): +55 81 3311-7458<tel:+55%2081%203311-7458> www.estaleiroatlanticosul.com.br<http://www.estaleiroatlanticosul.com.br/> Ilha de Tatuoca, s/n - Complexo Portuário de Suape Ipojuca-PE, Brasil, CEP (Zip Code) 55594-900<tel:55594-900> EAS Confidencial: 0800 721 5970<tel:0800%20721%205970> www.easconfidencial.com.br<http://www.easconfidencial.com.br/> Email enviado pelo celular A 21 de junho de 2018 10:04:15, "Marshall, Nathaniel (GE Power)" <nathaniel.marshall@ge.com> escreveu: I just have to say, that SimuTech video is remarkably clear and well done. I am impressed when I see that kind of methodical, efficient clarity of explanation. I remember stumbling on another video in the past with the same narrator, and thought the same thing at that time. Nat Nat Marshall Senior Engineer, Rotor Technology Generator Technology GE Power 1 River Road, Bldg 273-3002F Schenectady, NY 12345 -----Original Message----- From: Ross Hartwig [mailto:rgbh@finglowconsultants.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 6:13 AM To: XANSYS Mailing List Temporary Home <xansys-temp@xansystest.info> Subject: EXT: Re: [Xansys] Scoping method error on linearisation tool in workbench Hi Andrew, Thanks for your response. Unfortunately the manual isn't clear, at least not as I could find. It's a particularly frustrating bug, as a long time classic/APDL user, I'm used to being able to extract linearised stresses from models with cyclic symmetry and as a recent convert to Workbench, with all its bells and whistles, I was expecting at least this minimal functionality, so quite disappointed as you can imagine that it was missing. However, I have found a solution, which I'm sharing for any others who may have this issue in the future. And it doesn't require the use of standard symmetry, which is often not appropriate for asymmetrical-but-cyclic geometry. First I refer you to knowledge base item 2022347 which clearly indicates that linearisation under cyclic symmetry is not possible. The workaround requires the use of an APDL command snippet under the solution tree as demonstrated in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mv4bTvkaHmU by the guys at SimuTech. The advantage of this method is the cyclic nature of your model is maintained and cut planes do not need to be radial as long as geometry and nodes perfectly match. The results are excellent compared with true cyclic symmetry, tested under ANSYS 19.1. I hope this helps others as it has helped me! And I hope this is something ANSYS will include in future releases as standard. Regards, Ross Hartwig Finglow Consultants Ltd Beane Bridge House 34 Chambers Street Hertford Hertfordshire SG14 1PL Tel: 01992 585456 Fax: 01992 585466 e-mail: rgbh@finglowconsultants.co.uk Website: www.finglowconsultants.co.uk Sent from Finglow Consultants Limited Registered in England and Wales No. 2020210 Registered Office: Beane Bridge House, 34 Chambers Street, Hertford, Hertfordshire, SG14 1PL, England. The information contained in this email and any attachments may be confidential and is provided solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution, or use of this e-mail, its attachments or any information contained therein is unauthorised and prohibited. If you have received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachments. No responsibility is accepted for any virus or defect that might arise from opening this e-mail or attachments, whether or not it has been checked by anti-virus software. -----Original Message----- From: Kelly, Andrew [mailto:Andrew.Kelly@Honeywell.com] Sent: 20 June 2018 17:49 To: xansys-temp@xansystest.info Subject: Re: [Xansys] Scoping method error on linearisation tool in workbench I think linearization result item is not available on a model with cyclic symmetry. Pls check the manual; this issue sounds familiar to me. You may have to switch to symmetry and re-run to be able to use linearization. -- Andrew Andrew Kelly, P.E. Engineering Manager, Load Honeywell | Sensing & Productivity Solutions 2080 Arlingate Lane Columbus, OH 43228 Office: 614.850.7818 Toll Free: 800.848.6564 Fax: 614.850.1111 andrew.kelly@honeywell.com<mailto:andrew.kelly@honeywell.com> measurementsensors.honeywell.com Twitter: @HoneywellNow _______________________________________________ Xansys-temp mailing list Xansys-temp@xansystest.info http://xansystest.info/mailman/listinfo/xansys-temp_xansystest.info If you are receiving too many emails from XANSYS please consider changing account settings to Digest mode which will send a single email per day. Please send administrative requests such as deletion from XANSYS to xansys-mod@tynecomp.co.uk and not to the list _______________________________________________ Xansys-temp mailing list Xansys-temp@xansystest.info http://xansystest.info/mailman/listinfo/xansys-temp_xansystest.info If you are receiving too many emails from XANSYS please consider changing account settings to Digest mode which will send a single email per day. Please send administrative requests such as deletion from XANSYS to xansys-mod@tynecomp.co.uk and not to the list _______________________________________________ Xansys-temp mailing list Xansys-temp@xansystest.info http://xansystest.info/mailman/listinfo/xansys-temp_xansystest.info If you are receiving too many emails from XANSYS please consider changing account settings to Digest mode which will send a single email per day. Please send administrative requests such as deletion from XANSYS to xansys-mod@tynecomp.co.uk and not to the list

xansys-temp@list.xansys.org

Re: [Xansys] Scoping method error on linearisation tool in workbench